The Virgin Birth of Christ

Long ago through the Prophet Isaiah, the LORD said, “Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel: (Isa. 7:14). Skeptics have long assailed the truth of the virgin birth of Christ as a myth. However, at least three people knew that Jesus was born of the virgin. There are also three absolutely essential reasons why He had to be born of the virgin

Who are the people that knew Jesus was born of the virgin? Mary certainly knew that Jesus was virgin-born. When the angel Gabriel came to Mary and proclaimed she would conceive and bring forth a Son who would be called the Son of the Highest (Luke 1:30-32), she was perplexed over his statement. “Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?” (Luke 1:34). By this question Mary revealed she was still a virgin. Gabriel then explained she would be with child by the Holy Spirit (Luke 1:35). Joseph also knew that Jesus was virgin-born. When Mary was found to be with child, Joseph, being a just man, was considering divorcing her until the angel of the Lord told him in a dream that Mary was with child by the Holy Spirit (Matt. 1:18-20). In taking Mary as his wife, Joseph confirmed the virgin birth of Jesus Christ. Jesus certainly knew that He was virgin-born. In acknowledging He was the Son of God, Jesus was affirming the virgin birth. Read John 8:41, 42.

What are the essential reasons Jesus had to be born of the virgin? First, He had to be virgin-born to fulfill prophecy (Isa. 7:14). The prophecy of Genesis 3:15 demanded the virgin birth. Second, Jesus had to be born of the virgin to be the Son of God. He was not begotten by man; He was begotten by God, and only a virgin birth could proclaim that truth. Third, Jesus had to be virgin-born to redeem sinful man. If He were but a man, He could not have died for fallen man.

Jesus is Coming Again

As Jesus ascended into heaven, two men dressed in white stood by His disciples, saying to them, “Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven” (Acts 1:11). Several precious truths about the second coming of Jesus Christ are presented here. First, the fact of His second coming is established. He shall come from heaven even as He was seen going into heaven. He had said on an earlier occasion, “Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come” (Matt. 24:42), as He taught His disciples about His second coming. His coming again necessitates watching.

In the second place, the same Jesus, who was born of the virgin, grew up in Nazareth, worked as a carpenter, was baptized by John the Baptist and anointed by the Holy Spirit, worked miracles, gave the Sermon on the Mount, was betrayed by Judas and crucified on Calvary for our sins, rose from the grave the third day, and ascended into heaven, is coming again. In saying He would come again (John 14:3), He was not referring to another Jesus. There is but one Jesus, and He does not and cannot change because He is God (Mal. 3:6; Heb. 13:8).

Thirdly, Jesus will come from heaven in the very way He ascended into heaven: in a cloud. Referring to His second coming, Jesus said, “And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory” (Matt. 24:30). The clouds will be His chariot (Ps. 104:3). As Jehovah descended in the cloud upon Mt. Sinai to speak with Moses (Ex. 34:5), so Jehovah-Jesus will descend in a cloud upon the Mount of Olives to reign as king over all the earth (Zech. 14:4-9). Therefore, Jesus is coming again.

Fear of the Truth

Some people fear or dread the truth more than anything. They know the truth will expose their sin and guilt. Therefore, they seek to hold it down or suppress its testimony. Of such the Apostle Paul wrote, “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness” (Rom. 1:18). Because of their ungodly and unrighteous deeds, men seek to suppress the truth to protect their own reputations and interests, caring not that truth suffers as a consequence. Just as in the days of the Prophet Isaiah, “truth is fallen in the street” (Isa. 59:14).

There have always been liars, but when lying is institutionalized in a society, that society, whatever it might be, will not prosper in the long term. Truth may be suppressed for a time and lie prostrate in the streets, but it cannot be silenced for ever. All lies and liars will ultimately be exposed and refuted, and truth will arise triumphantly. Suppressing the truth and exalting the lie is deemed politically expedient and correct today. The apparent success of such tactics in various areas of society, especially where public thought is molded, is emboldening both the lie and the liar to say anything without fear of contradiction or exposure.

Aside from trying to suppress God’s Word (which is truth, John 17:17), perhaps the greatest attempt to silence truth and exalt the lie occurs in seeking to rewrite history. So-called historians are rewriting the history of the founding of the United States of America, making assertions which contradict the documented evidence of historians who lived at or near the times the country was founded. The unlearned citizenry have been deceived by these lies for the moment, but the truth will eventually triumph, exposing all lies and shaming all liars.

God's Self-Revelation

Job’s friend, Zophar, asked, “Canst thou by searching find out God? Canst thou find out the Almighty unto perfection?” (Job 11:7). The answer is no. Being inscrutable and incomprehensible to men, God cannot be known by man other than through His own self-revelation. Jesus said, “All things are delivered to me of my Father: and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him” (Luke 10:22). While much about God has been revealed in creation and providence, the greatest and clearest revelation of Himself is through the Bible and His Son.

If the Bible contained but the speculations of ancient men about God, it would be worthless. The world of religious thought can never comprehend God by its wisdom (1 Cor. 1:21). A true understanding of God must come from God Himself. The sacred Scriptures are the self-revelation of God. They are called God’s Word because every verse of every chapter of every book in the Bible is inspired of God (2 Tim. 3:16). The Scriptures are literally God-breathed. While He used about forty different writers to
write down His words, the Bible is not the words of men but the very words of God Himself, making it the Holy Bible.

The fullest revelation of God is in the Person of His Son, Jesus Christ. To Philip Jesus said, “He that hast seen me hath seen the Father” (John 14:9). The Son of God is called the “image of the invisible God” (Col. 1:15). In the Gospel of John it is written, “No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [explained] him” (John 1:18). If one wants to know God, he will find Him fully and perfectly revealed in His Son. As the Son of God, Jesus Christ is God revealed in the flesh.

God's Institutions

The institutions established by the LORD among men are three. First and oldest of these institutions is marriage. God created mankind as male and female (Gen. 1:27), separated the woman from the man (Gen. 2:21-23), and then united them in marriage in the Garden of Eden, making them one flesh (Gen. 2:24, 25). Since the LORD Himself founded marriage according to His will, no man or group of men has the right to issue laws to alter marriage in any way. The Lord Jesus confirmed God’s institution of marriage between a man and woman in Mark 10:6-9. Men may devise laws to sanction other kinds of unions, but those so-called unions are not God’s institution, and thus, not marriages. 

The second of God’s institutions is government. Government exists because God has ordained its existence (Rom. 13:1-4). Nothing is said about government before the flood in Noah’s day. Following the flood, the LORD instituted government when He said, “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man” (Gen. 9:6). Government exists to protect the helpless from the powerful, the innocent from the guilty, and the upright from the criminal, and to punish all evil-doers. If human governments cease to do that which they are ordained to do, then they have no reason to exist.

The third of God’s institutions is the church. Founded by Jesus Christ during His earthly ministry, the church from the beginning consisted only of believers in Christ who had been baptized upon their profession of faith (Acts 1:21, 22; 2:41). From the first church came many churches, each one being independent and separate from the others, having its own officers, and receiving the Word of God as its sole rule of faith and practice. Anything less is not the church.

The Work of the Church

The church is the only institution among men that will exist in eternity. Neither marriage nor government, which are ancient institutions, will exist in eternity; they were designed for this world only. But the church, while in this world, was not made for this world only. Thus, by inspiration the Apostle Paul wrote, “Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen” (Eph. 3:21). To say, then, that the church is a heavenly institution is not to stretch the truth, for Jesus Himself said the church was not of this world (John 15:18). Since the church is heavenly, its work must also be heavenly.

What is the work of the church? The preaching of the gospel of Jesus Christ is the chief work of the church (Mark 16:15). Those believing in Jesus Christ are then to be baptized and taught all things Christ has commanded (Matt. 28:18-20). These marching orders were given to the church by Christ Himself. No other institution has ever been commissioned to do the work the church alone is to do. No other work is as important as the preaching of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Yet today many churches have relegated this all important ministry to a secondary, if non-existent, place, and have taken up earthly causes as their main ministries. Thus, the social gospel is replacing the everlasting gospel. The feeding of the poor with food that perishes is given precedence over the feeding of God’s sheep with the Word of God. Why are churches leaving the ministry of the Word to serve tables (Acts 6:2)? Many charitable organizations exist which care for the physical needs of the poor whom Jesus said would always be with us (John 12:8). But no other institution but the church will ever preach the gospel and Jesus Christ and do the spiritual and heavenly work it was established to do.

The Earth is the Lord's

Global warming hysteria is making its way into all segments of our society, including many churches. When professing Christians began to fear for the future of the earth, one is made to wonder, “What god are they worshiping?” The God of the Bible is the Creator of the Earth, and He is also its Maintainer. It is said of the Son of God that He upholds all things by the word of His power (Heb. 1:3). The all things include the earth. Though the heathen may rage and the people imagine vain things (Ps. 2:1), yet no man or group of men, whether intentionally or unintentionally, can destroy the earth. God alone has that power and that right.

Are there climatic disasters upon the earth? Yes, but who made them? Psalm 46:8 states, “Come, behold the works of the Lord, what desolations he hath made in the earth.” The Prophet Nahum declared, “The Lord hath his way in the whirlwind and in the storm, and the clouds are the dust of his feet” (Na. 1:3). Such cataclysms are not the result of men’s economic and technological advancements, as people are being told today. Rather, these natural disasters are sent upon mankind as judgments and temporal punishment for their sinful ways. In the Old Testament, severe climatic conditions were always linked to the people’s forgetting God, worshiping false gods, and committing gross immoralities.

The earth will be destroyed one day but not by man. “But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men” (2 Pet. 3:7). Prior to their destruction, there will be cataclysmic activity all over the planet (Rev. 8:7-9:19). These Divine judgments upon the earth itself should give men reason to repent of their wicked deeds, but they will not repent (Rev. 9:20, 21). Consequently, the Lord will send even greater natural disasters upon the earth (Rev.16:1-21). Still there will be no repentance. Then the Lord Jesus will come, defeat the armies of the earth that have gathered together at Armageddon, and establish His visible kingdom in the earth over which He will be King alone (Rev. 19:11-20:6). It is not until the end of the one thousand years that this earth will finally be destroyed, and God, not man will do the destroying (Rev. 20:11).

Freedom and Truth

Our Lord declared, “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32). There can be no real freedom without the truth. Where truth is suppressed, personal liberties do not exist. Illustrations of this fact can be found all over the world. The opponents of truth sought to suppress it in the early history of our nation, but the advocates of truth would not compromise it, and First Amendment freedoms were secured.

Truth is and has always been under constant attack. The Prophet Isaiah long ago wrote, “Truth is fallen in the street” (Isa. 59:14). The Apostle Paul referred to those who hold down or suppress the truth in unrighteousness (Rom. 1:18). God’s truth was first assailed by Satan (Gen. 3:1-5) of whom Jesus said, “There is no truth in him” (John 8:44). While always seeking to suppress the truth, the devil and his disciples mislead the masses into believing his lies by promising them liberty. Of such the Apostle Peter ironically explained, “While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage” (2 Pet. 2:19).

Freedom is not the right to do as one chooses; it is the power to do what is right. People who believe the devil’s lies—that they can do as they choose—find themselves in bondage to him and to their own lusts. Those who enjoy real liberty discover they can do what is right without being intimidated or persecuted for it. Such freedom is not only under attack in the world, it is under attack in our nation. While laws are being passed to permit acts which are an abomination to the Lord, other laws are being passed to prohibit the reading and preaching of God’s Word. Why would anyone want to silence God’s Word? The reason is, His Word is truth (John 17:17), and a deceived people hate the truth.

God's Supreme Love

Since God is sovereign—there is no higher power than He—then His law is supreme and supersedes all other law. All of men’s laws, power, and authority are subject to God and His laws. “Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God” (Rom. 13:1). Government and its laws exist according to the will and purpose of God; they are also subject to God and His judgment. “God standeth in the congregation of the mighty: he judgeth among the gods” (Ps. 82:1). The term gods refers to those who are judges among men. No man or group of men, not even the Supreme Court of the United States of America, is absolutely supreme in judgment. Supremacy in all things belongs to God, and He will judge all men, even judges, by His eternal law of right and wrong (Revelation 20:12). 

God’s people are everywhere in Scripture instructed to obey the laws and statutes of men (Matt. 22:21; Rom. 13:2-5; 1 Pet. 2:13). At the same time, both our Lord and the Apostles demonstrated and taught that they were not obligated to obey unjust laws that usurped the prerogatives that belong to God alone. Any law that prohibits His people from worshiping and serving Him or requires them to disobey His law, is to be resisted (Matt. 15:2-6; Acts 5:29; Dan. 3:13-18). As long as man’s law does not restrict or prohibit their obedience to God’s law, they are bound to obey it without murmuring.

The laws of this country were founded on God’s laws as set forth in His Word. All of our founding documents confirm this fact. The Bill of Rights, especially the First Amendment, was adopted to insure the freedom of God’s people to worship God without intervention or harassment from the government. Yet today we are seeing laws based on God’s laws being erased from statute books, and new laws being adopted that are unjust and intrude upon the rights of God’s people to worship Him in truth. When any government prohibits the freedom to proclaim the truth of God’s Word in any area, it has overstepped its authority and ought not to be obeyed.

Proper and Improper Fear

Fear is both an interesting word and emotion. As a word, fear can refer either to reverence in a good sense or to terror in a bad sense. As an emotion, fear can either be positive or negative, liberating or enslaving. Proverbs 1:7 positively states that “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge. . .” while Proverbs 29:25 declares negatively that “The fear of man bringeth a snare. . .” In the former case, a reverential fear is meant; in the latter case a trembling fear or terror is suggested. Obviously, these passages refer to different kinds of fear.

A reverential fear toward the Lord is positive in every way. Good things are said about those who fear the LORD. They both hate evil and depart from evil by the fear of the LORD (Prov. 8:13; 16:6). The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom (Prov. 9:10), prolongs days (Prov. 10:27), and is a strong confidence as well as a fountain of life (Prov. 14:26, 27). It leads to riches, honor, and life (Prov. 22:4). Nothing negative or harmful results from the fear of the Lord.

A trembling fear or terror of man, however, is always negative. Nothing but torment ever comes from this kind of fear (1 John 4:18). Bullies and terrorists use fear as a weapon to torment and control people. The reason this tactic works is that people fear man instead of God. Goliath terrorized every man in Israel’s army with his size, threats, and challenges (1 Sam. 17:11), except a young lad named David who was not afraid of the giant because he feared the LORD. All forms of evil are prevailing in our day in this great country because people fear men more than they fear God. If this trend continues, we will be held hostage by both international and domestic bullies and terrorists. The fear of man indeed is a snare which entraps and enslaves men to those who create their terror.

Jesus is Jehovah

That Jesus Christ is God is evident from many passages of Scripture (e.g. John 20:28; Titus 2:13). Other passages of Scripture identify Him as Jehovah, the proper name of the one and only true God. Jehovah is derived from a Hebrew verb that means to be. When asked by Moses what His name was, “God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM! and he said Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you” (Ex. 3:14). Being self-existent, Jehovah is. He alone is a true Being; man, being created by God, is a creature

It has been alleged that Jesus Christ never claimed He was God. This assertion is false (Matt. 26:63, 64). But more to the point, Jesus asserted He was Jehovah every time He said “I am.” To the frightened disciples in the midst of a storm at sea Jesus came walking on the water, assuring them when they thought He was a spirit by saying, “Be of good cheer; it is I; be not afraid” (Mark 6:50). The proper English “It is I” is “I am” in the Greek text. The passages in which Jesus said “I am” are too numerous to mention in this space, but they are well-known.

Perhaps the most conclusive evidence that Jesus is Jehovah is found in John 12:39-41. By the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, these words which refer to Isaiah 6 identify Jesus Christ as Jehovah. Note that the saying of Isaiah the Prophet was fulfilled by the people’s not believing on Jesus despite His many miracles (John 12:37, 38). Then, referring to Isaiah 6, John wrote, “These things said Esaias, when he saw his [Jesus] glory, and spake of him.” Isaiah saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and the seraphim crying, “Holy, holy, holy, is Jehovah of hosts!” The Prophet also said, “Mine eyes have seen the King, Jehovah of hosts.” These words confirm that Jesus was Jehovah.

Fair or Just

Much is said these days about fairness. Even God is thought to be governed by fairness. God is not a fair God; He is a just God. “He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he” (Deut. 32:4). Fairness, as is used today, suggests God treats everyone the same. Scripture refutes this concept. “As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated” (Rom. 9:13). Justice or righteousness is an attribute of God; fairness is not. God judges people with equity (Ps. 98:9) which denotes the impartial distribution of justice, not fairness, as some seem to think. 

Justice is absolute; fairness is relative. Justice is upheld by God; fairness is demanded by men. Justice is objective, based on the law of God. Fairness is subjective, varying from person to person. Justice never changes because God and His Word are immutable; fairness is ever changing, based on the changing whims and emotions of men. Thus, the unchanging standards of right and wrong are altered by men today in order to produce the results they deem to be fair.

Believing it to be unfair that some are rich while others are poor, certain elitists seek to rectify this supposed inequity by unjustly redistributing wealth, which they must confiscate from some through high taxation to give to others who will re-elect them. Such policies never make the poor rich, but can only make all poor except, of course, the elitists who always find a way to enrich themselves at the public’s expense. Jesus said, “For the poor always ye have with you. . .” (John 12:8). After spending trillions of dollars on the Great Society, poverty has actually increased in this country. Even if we spend trillions more to eradicate poverty, the result will be the same because the poor will always be with us.

Credulous Unbelief

An unbelievable situation prevails among this generation: that which is truth and worthy of full acceptance is denied, and that which is unproven, false, and deserves to be denied is believed. I call this paradox credulous unbelief, for blatant unbelief underlies the problem described above. When people reject the truth, they are bound to believe the lie (2 Thess. 2:10, 11). The world at large contemptuously denies that God’s Word is truth but readily accepts any and every theory of men as truth. Is this not in reality credulous unbelief?

A case in point is man-made global warming. Many co-called experts are trying desperately to save the planet. Even churches are beginning to go green to help reduce carbon emissions. This issue is being decided by politics, not by science, and a credulous society is buying it as truth at great expense to itself and its economy. Yet the Word of God declares that God is the creator of the earth (Gen. 1:1), and as its creator, He is the only One who can destroy it. In fact, both the heavens and the earth are especially reserved for the day of God’s judgment (2 Pet. 3:7; Rev. 20:11-15). Nothing man can do will ever be able to destroy it.

In the words of the Apostle Paul, “For what if some do not believe? Shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar” (Rom. 3:3, 4). Those who believe the Bible are accused of being closed-minded, but what about a former Vice-President of this country who preaches man-made global warming but will not debate the issue with those who disagree with him? Is he afraid the facts will contradict his theory? Or does he fear his hypocrisy will be further exposed, and the public will learn that he expects others, not himself, to cease the use of all fossil fuels?

Who is Jesus Christ?

One would think the answer to this question is obvious to all, but apparently many in our day have no clue concerning who He really is. In recent days some have referred to Him as a community organizer in an attempt to bolster the weak resume of their presidential candidate. Jesus Christ was no mere community organizer, whatever that might be. Instead, He organized His church which He separated from the community. The word church is from the Greek ekklesia which is made up of ek meaning out of and kaleo meaning called. Thus, the church has been called out of the community to be separate from it.

Jesus Christ is the Son of God. To Mary, the Angel Gabriel announced, “And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest. . .” (Luke 1:31, 32). No one else has ever been called the Son of God in the same sense Jesus is the Son of God. While believers in Jesus Christ are called sons of God (John 1:12), they are sons by adoption, not by generation (Gal. 4:5). Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of God (John 3:16).

As the only begotten Son of God, Jesus Christ is God. The son of man is as much man as his father is. The Son of God is God just as His Father is. Those who heard Jesus call God His Father understood Him to say He was God. “Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God” (John 5:18). Religionists, including many in christendom, deny Jesus Christ is the Son of God. Notwithstanding such denials, God declared decisively that He is the Son of God by raising Him from the dead (Rom. 1:3).

One Way of Salvation

The Scripture declares, “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved “ (Acts 4:12). Salvation or deliverance from the guilt and penalty of sin cannot be experienced other than through the death and merit of Jesus Christ. There is nothing that anyone can do to free himself from the debt of sin. His good works cannot deliver him; neither can he purchase deliverance with silver or gold (1 Pet.1:18, 19). In vain do men look for salvation from their sins through religious rituals or ceremonies. Neither can any amount of water cleanse them from sin.

“But are there not many ways of salvation?” someone will surely protest. Not according to Jesus, for He Himself said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me” (John 14:6). Now His words are either true or they are not true. If they are not true, then they are a lie, making Jesus a liar. If He is a liar, how can anyone call Him a good man? But these words are absolute truth, and as truth we must believe them, or else reject them to our own eternal damnation. There is no salvation apart from faith in Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ is the only way of salvation because He is at once God and Man (John 1:1-3, 14). The God-Man alone qualifies as the Savior of men. It is against God that men have sinned, and since men can do absolutely nothing to deliver themselves from sin, God had to become Man in the person of Jesus Christ to bring them salvation. Thus, salvation is free, being given to sinners by grace, but it costs the Son of God His life, as He bled and died to purchase their redemption. Consequently, if men would be saved from their sins, they will receive salvation as a free gift through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. There is no other way of salvation. We have the word of the God-Man Himself for this fact.

God's Immutable Will

Like Himself, God’s will is immutable; it does not change. His will is immutable because it is eternal. God’s purpose, which is said to be eternal (Eph. 3:11) is that by which He works all things “after the counsel of his own will” (Eph. 1:11). Therefore, His will is eternal. Being eternal, it cannot change. If it were to change, the change would reflect some flaw or weakness requiring the change. Being perfect, God does not change; neither does He need to change His will.

What God does in time He had planned in eternity. He knows the future because He planned the future. His foreknowledge is not mere prescience. Neither does He react to men as men react to Him, as some assert. If He did, then His will and purpose would constantly be changing to reflect this reaction. But Scripture declares, “Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world” (Acts 15:18). Not one thing He planned from eternity to do will He fail to accomplish in time. Read all of Ephesians 1:11. 

God is sovereign and so is His will. Long ago He stated the sovereignty of His will when He said to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion” (Romans 9:15). The Apostle Paul, who quoted God’s words to Moses, then said, “So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy” (Romans 9:16). Today man’s supposed free will receives the stress in religious teachings, but in the Scripture, God’s free and sovereign will, together with the immutability of that will, receives the proper emphasis. No where do we ever find God really changing His will. It is no wonder then, that the Prophet Samuel exclaimed to King Saul, “And also the Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he is not a man, that he should repent” (1 Sam. 15:29).

Paranoia or Peace

Why do some folks seem to be paranoid while others enjoy great peace? The answer is found in their belief-system. Everyone believes something, and what he believes either brings him peace or paranoia. One who believes in the God of the Bible enjoys peace. He keeps in perfect peace, anyone whose mind is stayed on Him: because in so doing He trusts in Him (Isa. 26:3). The Lord Jesus said, “Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid” (John 14:27). This peace flows out of faith and cannot be taken from true believers.

What some people believe makes them paranoid. A belief in man-made global warming is a case in point. Certain self-appointed protectors of God’s earth (they do not believe He who created it can maintain it) have published doomsday predictions for the earth if certain carbon emissions are not decreased. The ice-caps will melt and coastal regions will be inundated, we are told. School children are being terrified with such speculations. Those who believe such things do so solely on the basis of men’s words which are both fallible and changeable.

Belief in truth will give one peace; belief in false ideas and predictions will make one paranoid. Those who believe the Bible are often accused of having blind faith. What of those who believe the unproven theories of men? Is not their faith really blind faith? Which do you believe: The Word of the God that cannot lie (Titus 1:2) or the words of men that have often been proven to be lies?


God Alone is Sovereign

That God alone is sovereign may come as quite a surprise to many, including some professing Christians, who seem to think man, not God, is sovereign. Since the word sovereign denotes one who has the highest authority, and one over whom no other has any control, God alone is sovereign. God’s sovereignty is clearly set forth in Scripture. “And all the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing: and he doeth according to his will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth: and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What doest thou?” (Dan. 4:35). Psalm 115:3 further states “But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.” Only of the God of heaven can such statements be made. The same cannot be said of any man.

Yet vain man would limit God’s sovereignty over him and assume to himself rights and powers he does not have. For example, God is made a prisoner of man’s so-called free will. God, we are told, would like to do many things for man, but man will not let Him? If man can limit God, then man, not God, is the one who is sovereign. But Scripture says otherwise. Since God alone is sovereign, then He, not man, does as He wills, even to the changing of man’s will. God’s choice, not man’s, is supreme in all things, including salvation.

“But God cannot save a sinner against his will” someone will protest. True, but He can change the sinner’s will, and He does in the new birth. Will, in any being and creature, is determined by nature. The sinner cannot change his nature by any decision of his will; rather, his will changes when his nature is changed. Only when the sinner is born again does he will to repent of his sin and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. His new birth is the result of God’s will alone, not of his will nor of the combined wills of God and himself (John 1:13; Jas. 1:18).

The Unchanging God

Of Himself, God says through the Prophet Malachi, “For I am the Lord, I change not. . .” (Mal. 3:6). The Word of God further states that there is no variableness or shadow of turning with the Father of lights (Jas. 1:17). These and other passages teach the truth of the immutability of God. This same attribute characterizes our Lord Jesus Christ of whom it is said, “Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and today, and forever” (Heb. 13:8). Change is true of men and this world in time; immutability describes God and His Son.

Since God is perfect, He cannot change, for any change must be either for the better or for the worse. If God changed for the better, then He would not have been perfect and, thus, not God. If He changed for the worse, though perfect at one time, He would have become imperfect, and thus, ceased to be God. But God cannot change! Someone will contend, “He could change if He wanted to change.” But God cannot will to change because of His immutable nature. His nature determines His will, not visa versa. It is said of God that He cannot lie (Titus 1:2). He has no ability to lie because of His immutable and holy nature.

Because God does not change, truth cannot change. Moses says of God, “He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he” (Deut. 32:4). Truth comes from God; therefore, it cannot change. What is true today was true yesterday, and shall be true tomorrow. Absolute truth is never what is true to an individual at this moment. Truth is objective, not subjective. Truth is what the immutable God has declared it to be. The Word of God is truth (John 17:17). That truth is taught to us by the Spirit of truth (John 16:13), and in that truth is revealed the Lord Jesus Christ who alone is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6).

Baptists in America before 1800

Ephesians 3:21

INTRODUCTION: As Baptists we believe in the perpetuity of the church. Begun by our Lord as He walked along the shores of the Sea of Galilee and called-out the first baptized believers who both adhered to His teachings and executed His commandments, the church has existed in all ages since in churches which have descended from this first church. The Lord’s Churches, as we have seen, have been called by many names. Having come to America from England and Wales—where they were known as Particular Baptists in distinction from General Baptists—these Baptists in America came to be known as Regular Baptists to distinguish them from the Separate Baptists with whom they would unite prior to 1800.

The Baptists in America have a glowing history. One cannot read the various historical accounts of the role of Baptists in the founding of America, the winning of the Revolutionary War, and the securing of personal and religious freedom without being both proud and humbly grateful to be a Baptist. Life in early America, however, was not easy for the Baptists. Hated alike by both the Congregational Church in New England, and the Established or Episcopal in Virginia, the Baptists suffered immensely both physically and financially at their hands. From the scourging of Obadiah Holmes in Massachusetts to the imprisonment of John Waller, Lewis Craig, and James Childs in Virginia for preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ, Baptists have paid a tremendous price for religious liberty in America. A noted Presbyterian historian, William Wirt Henry wrote almost grudgingly, “It is proper for me to say, however, that the Baptists were constant, unwavering, and very effective in the part they took for the same end [the divorce of church and state in Virginia]. They had felt the heel of the oppressor more keenly than the Presbyterians, as many of their ministers had refused to apply for license to preach under the Toleration Act, and as a consequence were often imprisoned as disturbers of the peace. They found an advocate, however, in Patrick Henry, who appeared for them in court whenever it was in his power” (Documentary History of the Struggle for Religious Liberty in Virginia and the Presbyterian Church and Religious Liberty in Virginia p.291). 

For our present purpose, we will limit our study to but four issues concerning the Baptists in America before 1800, viz. The First Baptist Church and Churches, the First Baptist Association and Associations, The Regular and Separate Baptists, and the Baptists and Religious Liberty.

THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH AND CHURCHES

Paedobaptist and Campbellite historians have claimed that Baptists are without baptism, ordinances, and even a history because it is alleged that one Roger Williams, a Paedobaptist virtually baptized himself and eleven others and organized themselves into the first Baptist Church in America. These historians falsely assumed that all Baptist Churches in America descended from the church Williams founded, and wrongly concluded that all Baptist Churches are without baptism, and hence, not churches.

First, Roger Williams was not a Baptist. No doubt he was a great man and held much in common with the Baptists. But he was no Baptist. Had he been a true Baptist, he would never have sought to re-institute baptism, for he would have shared in common with the Baptists the conviction that they had heaven’s baptism. J. R. Graves says Williams “was never a Baptist one hour in his life. No authentic document sustains the claim that he was ever the member of, or communed or affiliated with any Baptist Church” (The First Baptist Church in America, p.50). Samuel Adlam says, “I can see no evidence that Roger Williams, in the ordinary acceptation of the term, established a Baptist Church in Providence” (The First Church in Providence not the Oldest Baptist Church in America, p. 153). Adlam also contended the Providence church, which many historians say Roger Williams started, was founded in 1652, not 1639.

Second, the first Baptist Church in America was founded by Dr. John Clarke in Newport, R. I. in 1638. Dr. Graves visited Newport in 1854 to meet Dr. Adlam who was the historian of Rhode Island as well as the pastor of the First Baptist Church in Newport, the very church founded by Dr. Clarke. Under the guidance of Dr. Adlam, Dr. Graves found the grave of Dr. John Clarke. On the monument at this neglected grave, Dr. Graves read, “To the Memory of DOCTOR JOHN CLARKE, One of the original purchasers and proprietors of this island and of the founders of the First Baptist Church of Newport, its first pastor and munificent benefactor. . .He, with his associates, came to this island from Mass., in March, 1638. . .He shortly after gathered the church aforesaid and became its pastor. . .” (The First Baptist Church in American, p. 13). For some reason, Dr. Clarke is slighted by most historians, and most of the credit for securing a charter for Rhode Island is erroneously given to Roger Williams. Even Baptist historians claim the date of the founding of the First Baptist Church in Newport was 1644, so that Williams can be recognized as the founder of the First Baptist Church in America. Morgan Edwards contended that John Clark was properly the founder of the Rhode Island Colony (A General History of the Baptist Denomination, David Benedicts, Vol. 1, p. 453, footnote). Dr. Graves relates the conversation he had with David Benedict, the venerable Baptist historian, while he was in Rhode Island researching the origin of the First Baptist Church in America. Dr. Benedict was 90 years old at that time, and as they spoke about the origin of the two churches, Dr. Benedict admitted “growing perplexities had for years confused and unsettled his mind as to the correctness of Mr. James Stanford’s history of the Providence church, compiled without any church record, and a full century after its origin (The First Baptist Church in America, p. 21). The editor of A History of New England with Particular Reference to the Denomination of Christians called BAPTISTS by Isaac Backus (second edition, with notes by David Weston, published by the Backus Historical Society, 1871) in a footnote in Vol. 1, p. 125 says concerning the date the Newport Church was founded, “Backus represents than an earlier date is possible. Many regard the weight of evidence as in its favor. Some have placed it as far back as 1638, supposing that the church was founded by Clarke and his company upon their arrival on Rhode Island.” The Warren Association acknowledged that 1638 was the correct date for the founding of this church. From the Minutes of the Eighty-second Anniversary of the Warren Baptist Association, Sept. 12-13 (Providence: Printed by H. H.Brown, 1849) pp. 11,13-15, we learn “A committee appointed by the Warren Baptist Association at its annual meeting in 1848, reported at the following annual meeting at Pawtuxet on Sept. 12-13, 1849, the following conclusion: 'From this investigation, your committee are of the opinion that the Church at Newport was formed certainly before the first of May, 1639, and probably, on the 7th of March, 1638'" (John Clarke, Louis Franklin Asher, p. 45, Footnote #3).

But few Baptist Churches descended from these two churches in Rhode Island. Some churches were constituted in their native land and immigrated to America as a body. Joshua Thomas states that the Welch Tract Church was constituted in 1701 in Wales and came to America, staying for a short time in Pennsylvania before settling in Delaware. According to Thomas, several churches in America came from churches in Wales (The American Baptist Heritage in Wales, pp 2, & xv in Introduction).

THE FIRST BAPTIST ASSOCIATION AND ASSOCIATIONS

Although every Baptist Church is autonomous and independent of other Baptist Churches, Baptists have always associated and cooperated in the kingdom of God. Associations can be found in England, Wales, and other countries throughout the ages. The churches of the New Testament associated and cooperated in receiving funds for the poor saints in Jerusalem, (1 Cor. 16:1). It is not surprising, therefore, to find Baptist Churches forming associations early in their history in America. 

The first Baptist Association in America was organized in 1707 in Philadelphia by five churches, and it was appropriately called the Philadelphia Baptist Association. “The Philadelphia Association originated with churches planted by members from Wales.” (Preface in the Minutes of the Philadelphia Baptist Association from 1707 to 1807, p.3). The five founding churches were the Pennepek, the Welsh Tract, the Middleton, the Piscataqua, and the Cohansie churches. The churches of the Philadelphia Baptist Association published a Confession of Faith and Discipline in 1742. This Confession was essentially the Second London Confession of Faith by about forty churches in London, first published in 1677.

Because of the numerical growth of Baptist Churches and the distances between them, several new associations were formed in various states. The Charleston Association in South Carolina was organized in 1751. In North Carolina the Sandy Creek Association was organized in 1760. The Kehukee Association was formed in North Carolina in 1765, and the Ketocton Association began in 1766 in Virginia. The Warren Association was organized in Rhode Island in 1767. Many other associations were formed in the following years. In his Baptist Encyclopedia published in 1881, William Cathcart lists a total of 15 associations which had been organized by the year 1787. By 1800 Regular Baptist Churches numbers about 1,500 with about 100,000 members according Hassel’s History of the Church of God, p. 558. John T. Christians states there were 48 Baptist Associations by the year 1800 (A History of the Baptists, vol. 2, p. 150).

THE REGULAR AND THE SEPARATE BAPTISTS

The first Baptists in America, for the most part, were Particular Baptists. They were called Particular Baptists because they believed the atonement which Christ made on the cross was for a particular people, namely, the elect. There was another group of Baptist Churches which were known as General Baptists. The General Baptists believed the atonement was made generally for every man, woman, boy, and girl who has ever lived or will ever live, including those who died in unbelief and are in hell. 

But during the Great Awakening another group of Baptists arose who were called Separates. In New England a great moving of the Spirit accompanied the preaching of Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield among paedobaptist churches, particularly the Congregational Churches. Many people, including men like Isaac Backus, were saved during this revival. Christian states, “With the origin of this revival the Baptists had nothing to do; but from it they reaped great results.” (A History of the Baptists, Vol. 2, p. 167) Prior to the year 1734, there was extreme spiritual deadness in the state churches. Edwards and Whitefield preached the doctrines of grace, the sovereignty of God being the central them, according to Christian (p. 175). The state churches protested against the Great Awakening, causing many of those who had been saved to withdraw from them and organize Separate or New Light churches. During this time, Jonathan Edwards was ejected from his church at Northhampton (A History of the Baptists, vol. 2, pp. 177, 178.

Once these churches were separated from the state churches, they began to believe the Bible and Baptist principles taught therein. Many of them saw the doctrine of the baptism of believers by immersion and sought out Baptist ministers to baptize them. Christian quotes Baron Stow as saying, “In May 1749, thirteen of the members [of Separate Churches] submitted to this ordinance, administered according to apostolic direction and practice. The ordinance was administered by Rev. Mr. Moulton of Brimfield. About fifty of the members were soon afterward baptized, including with those before mentioned the Pastor, the Deacons and the Ruling Elders (A History of the Baptists, vol. 2, pp. 182, 183).

Through the efforts of men like John Gano, James Miller, and David Thomas and others, who were sent by the Philadelphia Association to visit these Separate Baptist Churches, the Separates and the Regulars finally united in Virginia and became known as United Baptists. They united in their common faith in the doctrines and practices set forth in the Philadelphia Confession of Faith.

THE BAPTISTS AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY

Believing in liberty of conscience, the Baptists have ever championed religious liberty. When that liberty could not be enjoyed in a particular land, the ancient Baptists such as the Waldenses would seek refuge in secluded places like the Mountains of Piemont. The vast new land called America provided the Baptists the opportunity they had long sought to worship God and practice their faith openly. They were therefore drawn to America.

Those Baptists who first immigrated to America found the same old prejudices against them that they had faced in Europe. Protestant denominations were state churches in Europe, and they sought to establish the same union of church and state in the new land. Certain eminent Baptists, including John Clarke, John Crandall, and Obadiah Holmes suffered severe persecution in Massachusetts at the hands of the state church for conducting services in a home of an elderly church member. They were arrested, imprisoned, and threatened with fines and whippings. Others paid the fines for Dr. Clarke and Mr. Crandall, but Obadiah Holmes refused the have his fine paid and was whipped so unmercifully he could not lie down for two weeks. It was the spirit of persecution which led Dr. John Clarke together with Roger Williams to seek a charter for a colony in Rhode Island where religious liberty for all would be established. Isaac Backus wrote of Dr. Clarke, “This faith, which was also held by Mr. Williams, moved them to spend their lives for the welfare of mankind, and to establish the first government upon earth, since the rise of antichrist, which gave equal liberty, civil and religious, to all men therein.” (Your Baptist Heritage, p. 83). It is reported that the building next to the First Baptist Church in Newport was a Jewish synagogue. Religious freedom had finally been established in this world.

The Baptists were continually involved in the battle for freedom, including political freedom from Great Britain. When the policies of the mother country and the ill-treatment of the colonists became unbearable, many began to demand independence from their native homeland. From the very first, the Baptists supported independence. Dr. Charles F. James in his excellent Documentary History of the Struggle for Religious Liberty in Virginia on page 52 quotes the Baptist Address placed before the Colonial Convention of 1775 in Virginia in which the Baptists “. . .had determined in some cases it was lawful to go to war and that they ought to make a military resistance against Great Britain in her unjust invasion, tyrannical oppression, and repeated hostilities; that their brethren were left at discretion to enlist without incurring the censure of their religious community. . .” Dr. James further wrote on page 57, “And as it is matter of history that the Baptists had already won the sympathies and friendship of such men as Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, it is not unreasonable to suppose that, in the management of their long and desperate struggle for religious freedom, they were guided to some extent, at least, by the advice of these great men.” William Cathcart said, “Few Tories can be found among the Baptists of the Revolution.” (Baptist Patriots and the American Revolution, p. 70) In this book, Cathcart names several prominent Baptists who fought in the Revolutionary war against the British.

The battle for religious freedom was not won until 1789 when the First Amendment to the Constitution was ratified. Patrick Henry favored the establishment of four churches or denominations as state churches in the new government: the Episcopalians, the Presbyterians, the Methodists, and the Baptists (Documentary History of the Struggle for Religious Liberty in Virginia, p. 131). Only the Baptists opposed this establishment. Among the delegates who were nominated to the Constitutional Convention from Virginia was Elder John Leland, an influential preacher among the Baptists. Leland was pitted against James Madison. Madison made a special trip to see Leland, and after spending a half of a day assuring Leland and others he favored religious liberty’s being placed into a Bill of Rights, won the support of Leland who withdrew in his favor. It is believed the sentiments and arguments of Patrick Henry would have defeated the ratification of the constitution except for the presence and influence of James Madison. Referring to this incident in a eulogy upon the character of Mr. Madison, the Hon. J. S. Barbour gave John Leland the credit for the ratification of the Constitution by Virginia and the triumph of the new system of government (Documentary History of the Struggle for Religious Liberty in Virginia, p. 155).

CONCLUSION: OUR BAPTIST FOREFATHERS HAVE LEFT LARGE SHOES FOR US TO FILL!

May we be as diligent to protect religious freedom as they were to secure it. May we be as valiant for truth as they were to advocate and defend it. May we be as willing to suffer and sacrifice for the cause of Christ and His Church as they were.

May others come realize what they owe the Baptists. Religious liberty is a reality in the United States of America due to the persistent efforts and influence of the Baptists. No other denomination of Christians has the consistent record of championing religious liberty as the Baptists have done.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adlam. S. The First Church in Providence not the Oldest Baptist Church in America.
(Edited by J. R. Graves). Texarkana AR-TX: Baptist Sunday School Committee, 1939.

Asher, Louis. John Clarke. [n.p.] [n.n.] [ n.d.]

Backus, Isaac. A History of New England with Particular Reference to the Baptists. New York: Arno Press & the New York Times, 1969 (first published in 1871).

Cathcart, William. Baptist Patriots and the American Revolution. Grand Rapids, MI: Guardian Press, 1976 (first published in 1876 as The Baptists and the American Revolution).

---------. The Baptist Encyclopedia. Philadelphia: Louis H. Everts, 1881.

Christian, John T. A History of the Baptists. 2 vols. Texarkana, AR-TX: Bogard Press, 1997 (first published in 1926).

Hassal, Cushing Biggs and Sylvester. History of the Church of God from the Creation to A.D. 1885. Middletown, New York: Gilbert Beebe’s Sons Publishers, 1886.

Henry, William Wirt. The Presbyterian Church and Religious Liberty in Virginia. Harrisonburg, VA: Sprinkle Publications, 2007 (first published in 1900).

James, Charles F. Documentary History of the Struggle for Religious Liberty in Virginia. Harrisonburg, VA: Sprinkle Publications, 2007 (first published in 1900).

Gillette, A. D. Minutes of the Philadelphia Baptist Association from 1707 to 1807. Philadelphia: American Baptist Publication Society, 1851.

Graves, J. R. (ed.). The First Baptist Church in America. Texarkana, AR-TX: Baptist Sunday School Committee, 1939.

Thomas, Joshua. The American Baptist Heritage in Wales. Lafayette, TN: Church History Research and Archives, 1976.